Відео

"We provide additional validation to the non-Levantine origin of AJs using ancient DNA from the Near East and the Levant. Due to the rising popularity of geo-localization tools to address questions of origin, we briefly discuss the advantages and limitations of popular tools with focus on the GPS approach. Our results reinforce the non-Levantine origins of AJs." www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478715/

This is a very knowledgeable video!! Thank you John. And also, we do believe in the assurance of his forgiveness of course since he is theMost Merciful 😊

Appreciate this view of yours as a Muslim, thank you!

Amen

Sseg

cool info

Islam a Abrahamic religion??? Skip

I understand that this is a very old video only recommendation more spirit it attracts a larger audience

Thanks

What is the source please ???

let's see if i can write 10 pages long essays regarding this topic (i only watched this video)

class wooork lol. 😢

té per favoure

I dare everyone who reads my comment to yell cheeseburger 💀🍔

doing my classwork lol

Very Nice

How long he hell can Abraham or Issac establish Israel when Jacob/Israel wasn’t even born yet? Also, Being a Jew denotes being from the Tribe or Kingdom of Judah. Judah was Israel’s Fourth born son. Hebrews we’re not called Jews at that time. And Hebrew is a reference to our forefather Eber.

Hebrews are different from jews

Thank You for sharing this video

This video helps me understand a lot thank you.

Great video, my man. Keep up the golden standard, baby!

My man, thank you brother!

The term 'Hebrew' ('bry,plural 'brym, 'bryym, feminine 'bryt) occurs seventeen times in the Hebrew Bible, and three times in the Christian scriptures (Acts 6:1; 2 Corinthians 11:22; Philippians 3:5). In the Christian texts, it is used to distinguish Christians who were ethnically Jews from others-particularly 'Hellenists'(Acts 6:1). In the Hebrew texts, its usage is somewhat vague; the reading of these texts, however, leaves one with the impression that the people of ancient Israel were originally regarded as 'Hebrew' tribes. What can one say about the 'Hebrews'? So far, many attempts have been made to identify the Biblical 'brym with the ha-pi-ru of the cuneiform texts, the Ugaritic 'prm, the Egyptian'pr, and the habiru of the Amarna Letters ( for the Amarna Letters, see Chapter 5). Such people are generally believed to have been not so much an ethnic group as a social class of people obeying no authority and living outside the law, such as bandits, mercenaries, vagabonds or pedlars. Had these ha-pi-ru really been the Biblical 'brym, the cuneiform texts, written in languages closely related to Biblical Hebrew, would surely have spelt their name correctly, without one or more fundamental consonontal changes.From examination of the Egyptian topographical lists in Chapter 11, one finds that the ancient Egyptians also reproduced the consonantal structure of Semitic place-names correctly; they certainly never took a b to be a p. Hence, the Egyptians 'pr could hardly have been a misrendering of the Hebrew 'br- the root from which 'brym derives. To gain a clearer insight into what the 'Hebrews' originally were, one may turn to the story of Abraham in Genesis, where this patriarch goes under two names, Abram ('brm), until Genesis 17, and Abraham ('brhm), starting from Genesis 18. Regardless of whether or not Abram and Abraham were the same person, the Genesis story treats them as such. In Genesis 14:13, this patriarch, who is regarded as the ancestor of the Israelites and other related peoples, is called 'Abram the Hebrew' ('brm h-'bry). he is also said to have been living 'by the oaks (more likely, the wood of Mamre' (b-'ny mmr'. literally in, not by the wood of Mamre). This same Abram is described as living ' in the wood' of Moreh (mwrh) in Genesis 12: 6, and ' in the wood' of Mamre(same as above) in Genesis 13:18. The latter wood features again as the home of Abraham in Genesis 18:1, right where the change in the name of the patriarch occurs. Clearly, the claimed ancestor of the Israelites, as depicted in Genesis, was ' a Hebrew', or 'bry, a man who lived in the woods.The term 'bry itself may denote this. So far taken to be the equivalent of the Arabic verb 'br ( vocalised, 'abara ), 'cross, cross over, traverse', the Hebrew 'br in 'bry, or its plural 'brym,can just as well be the equivalent of the Arabic collective plural noun gbr ( vocalised gabar, singular gabarah, or gbrh), meaning ' woods'. The 'Hebrews could have been the West Arabian folk of the woods. In the Dhahran region, in the southernmost highlands of Asir, there stands to this day a village called Al al- Ghabaran ( 'l gbrn, ' god of the woods'). Could a god by this name have been the 'lhy h-'brym ('God of the Hebrews' RSV) identified as Yahweh, the God of Israel, in six passages of Exodus (3:18. 5:3, 7:16, 9:1, 13, 10:3) To find out where the 'Hebrew' wood folk of West Arabia were believed to have originated, one may follow the trek of 'Abram the Hebrew', as described in Genesis 11:31-13:18. Reportedly, Abram and his folk came originally from Ur Kasdim, or 'wr ksdym. The traditional rendering of this Ur Kasdim as Ur of the Chaldeans', taken to be Mesopotamia, comes from the Greek Septuagint, and thus represents a geographic misinterpretation of the Hellenistic period. Actually, Abram's original home must have been present Waryah (wry, cf. 'wr) in Wadi Adam, Biblically identified in relation to Maqsud (mqsd, cf. ksdym), a place which is still there in the same region. From there, Abram and his folk moved to 'Haran' (hrn)- apparently present day Khayran (hyrn), also in Wadi Adam.At this point Abram parted company with his people and proceeded southwards to the vicinity of 'Shechem' (skm), today al- Kashmah (ksm), in Rijal Alma', where he settled in the wood of 'Moreh'- apparently present -day Marwah (mrwh, one of two villages by the same name in Asir, the other being the Biblical 'Moriah',see chapter 12). Next, Abram moved to the 'mountain' (i.e. the ridge) east of 'Bethel' (byt 'l), present Batilah (btl), in Rijal Alma' (see chapter 4) , encamping in a place where 'Bethel' was to his west and 'Ai' (h-'y, present al-Ghayy, in the same region,to his east. There is actually a Bethel called Bayt Ula (byt 'l) in Palestine,in the region of al-Khalil (or Hebron'). At a considerable distance to the east, across the Dead Sea, there is an Ai called Khirbat 'Ayy ('y), in the region of al -Karak. The two regions, however, are seperated from one another not by a mountain, but by the particularly deep valley of the Dead Sea. It is perhaps for this reason that Biblical scholars have not identified these places as the Bethel and Ai of Abram, and rightly so. However, their suggestion that the Bethel in question is the Palestinian Baytin, and Ai the nearby al-Tall ,is untenable on all counts. Abram's next move was in the direction of 'the Negeb' (h-ngb, today al- Naqab, or nqb, again in Rijal Alma').From there he went to msrym- not 'Egypt', as the traditional identification has it, but present Misramah (msrm), near Abha, where he reportedly got into trouble with 'Pharaoh'- pr'h, apparently the local god. After a sojourn there, which reportedly brought him great wealth, probably through trade in livestock, Abram returned to Rijal Alma'- first to 'the Negeb', or al-Naqab; then to the site of his earlier encampment between 'Bethel, or Batilah, and 'Ai', or al-Ghayy. It was from there that he finally went to settle in the wood of 'Mamre'(mmr'), near 'Hebron' (hbrwn)- today Namirah (nmr), near Khirban (hrbn), in the hill country of the hinterland of Qunfudhah. In the vicinity of Namirah, and in the same Qunfudhah region, there exists to this day a cluster of four villages called Qaryat Al Silan, Qaryat al-Shiyab. Qaryat 'Asiyah and Qaryat 'Amir- no doubt the 'Kiriath- arba (qryt 'rb', 'village of four' or 'villages of four', perhaps four gods) where the patriarch's wife died (Genesis23:2), which is identified in the same context with 'Hebron'. In the same vicinity also stands the village of Maqfalah (mqplh), carrying to this day the name of the cave of ' Machphelah'(mkplh),which the patriarch purchased outside 'Hebron' as a place of burial for his family (Genesis 23:9f). So much for the geographic precision of the Genesis story. More generally, one might also add that the name of Abram ('brm) survives as that of two locations in the regions where he mostly lived: the village of Sha'b Baram (the 'valley' of brm), in Rijal Alma'; and Barmah (brm), in the Qunfudhah region. Clearly, the career of Abram centred around the region of Rijal Alma' and the hill country further to the north, in the hinterland of Qunfudhah-areas where dense forests of juniper and cypress at the higher elevations, and savannahs of terebinth, acacia and other forest trees at the lower ones, are interspersed with pastures and arable lands. Incidentally, the 'wood'of Abraham's 'Mamre' is represented today by the clusterof acacia trees and tamarisks in the vicinity of Namirah and Khirban, inthe Qunfudhah hinterland. What was in question was neither 'oaks' ( as in the Biblical translations) nor 'terebinths'(as in the more recent ones). Misramah, however, where the patriarch settled for a while, was no doubt an important market town, much as neighbouring Abha and Khamis Mushait have been in more recent times. The highlands there are intensively cultivated and located at an important junction of trade routes.Abram reportedly went there when 'there was famine in the land', probably caused by locusts, as until recently the wadis on the maritime side of Asir were infested by these voracious pests. Extract from Professor Kamal Salibi's book, 'The Bible Came From Arabia'

Man in the first second he just mentioned the thing in the book thank you very much

Where is preservation

I m muslim , can I marry a hindu man ?

Awesome thanks sir

After 7 year 😎

The state is nothing more than a vehicle some use to control the actions of others. In the final analysis, it's only ever been about forcing others to do that which it has been impossible to persuade them to do voluntarily.

Hello world

good vid

Thanko sir😊

I’m watching this for fun, thanks!

can I have the example of religious conflict

La

You forgot the Stationary Bandit theory, the one that explains that state was (is) a criminal faction.

The information was short but covered all the important points. Thank you sir

The information was short but covered all the important points. Thank you sir

Good information. Thank you!

Really helpful

ASS 😟

This was a very informative video. I am trying to gain employment w DHS.

Tqs sir for your work

Concise, love from Pakistan.💕❤

Thanks!

Nice

I'm taking this class in the future

Thank you, very clear.

good job

Great video people should be learning more about government agencies and its functions than watching ignorant rappers mumbling nonsense rap songs Thanks